Amazon’s marketplace is a ruthless battleground where every decision can significantly impact your profitability and control.

One of the most critical decisions sellers face is choosing between selling as a first-party (1P Amazon) vendor or a third-party (3P) seller.

Both models present substantial opportunities, but the differences go far beyond just pricing and margins.

Knowing which route is optimal for your business requires a deeper understanding of your goals, operations, and the kind of control you want over your brand.

As you scale your business, you’ll quickly realize that the 1P Amazon versus 3P choice is not a one-size-fits-all decision. It hinges on various factors like logistical capabilities, pricing flexibility, and operational complexity.

Pricing Control: 3P Takes the Lead

When you sell as a 1P Amazon vendor, you’re essentially giving Amazon the reins over your pricing. Once you supply your products to Amazon, they determine the final sale price.

For brands concerned about pricing parity across multiple channels, this can be a nightmare.

Amazon’s algorithms are designed to offer customers the lowest price possible, which can lead to steep discounts, eroding your margins and undermining your efforts to maintain consistent pricing across other retail platforms.

On the other hand, as a 3P seller, you maintain full control over your pricing.

Whether you opt for Fulfillment by Amazon or Fulfillment by Merchant, you set the retail price and have the flexibility to adjust based on market conditions, competitors, and inventory levels.

This flexibility is vital for brands looking to protect their premium pricing or respond quickly to seasonal demand spikes.

If maintaining your brand’s premium image or preventing price wars is a priority, the 3P model will give you much more control.

Understanding 1P Amazon: What It Really Means

The term “1P Amazon” refers to the first-party relationship where Amazon acts as a retailer for your products. Under this model, Amazon buys inventory from you wholesale and sells it directly to consumers.

While this can provide significant sales volume and exposure, you lose control over pricing and have limited direct interaction with customers.

Amazon’s algorithms will decide final sale prices, often optimizing for volume and customer experience over brand pricing strategies.

For many brands, this trade-off can be challenging, especially when trying to manage profitability across multiple channels.

Data Visibility: A Critical Differentiator

The data you have access to under each model can significantly influence your decision.

As a 1P Amazon vendor, Amazon treats you like a supplier, so your insights into customer behavior, search trends, and product performance are limited.

The Vendor Central dashboard is notoriously thin on valuable data that could help you make informed decisions.

Contrast that with the 3P model, where Seller Central provides you with deep insights into customer buying patterns, advertising performance, and even competitors.

You can access detailed reports on traffic, keyword performance, and conversion rates.

This wealth of data allows you to optimize your listings, tweak your advertising strategy, and even explore new product opportunities based on actual buyer behavior.

Data visibility is one of the most underrated aspects of the 3P model. For sellers who rely heavily on data-driven decision-making, this alone might tilt the scale toward 3P selling.

Inventory and Logistics: The Hidden Costs of 1P

Amazon’s Vendor Central promises to handle the heavy lifting when it comes to logistics.

As a 1P vendor, you ship in bulk to Amazon, and they handle the rest. But with that convenience comes a cost—both financially and operationally.

Amazon often demands large quantities of inventory, which can strain your cash flow and warehouse space.

And if Amazon over-orders or underestimates demand, you could find yourself dealing with excess stock or missed sales opportunities.

With the 3P model, you have much more flexibility. You can choose between FBA, which allows you to store inventory in Amazon’s warehouses and have them handle fulfillment, or FBM, where you manage your own logistics.

This flexibility lets you better control your inventory levels, reduce storage costs, and respond quickly to changes in demand.

For high-margin, high-velocity products, 3P can be particularly advantageous because you can avoid locking up too much capital in Amazon’s warehouses.

On the flip side, if you have the logistical capacity to handle larger shipments and don’t mind the cash-flow constraints, the 1P model might still be worth considering.

Negotiating Power and Vendor Relations

Vendor relationships in the 1P model are often characterized by tough negotiations. Amazon is a notoriously aggressive buyer, and once you sign on as a vendor, you’re subject to their demands.

This can mean aggressive payment terms, significant discounts, and frequent requests for promotional allowances or funding for Amazon’s retail programs like Subscribe & Save.

For brands that value autonomy and want to avoid getting locked into Amazon’s demands, the 3P model offers much more freedom. You are the seller, and Amazon is merely the platform.

There’s no pressure to negotiate unfavorable terms or meet excessive demands for co-op fees.

However, for businesses looking for scale and are willing to make concessions in exchange for Amazon’s logistical might, the 1P route could provide a quick path to wider retail distribution.

It’s also worth noting that some brands who excel as 1P vendors are able to negotiate better terms once they’ve established a strong sales record.

Brand Control: Who Owns the Customer?

One of the biggest pain points for 1P vendors is the lack of direct communication with customers. Amazon handles customer service, and sellers have limited opportunities to build long-term relationships with buyers.

Any marketing or communication you wish to engage in is filtered through Amazon’s systems, which restricts your ability to develop brand loyalty outside of the marketplace.

You can communicate directly with buyers, provide customized customer service, and control the post-purchase experience.

Even with FBA, while Amazon handles most customer interactions, you still retain some level of control over returns, packaging, and insert materials.

For brands looking to create lasting relationships with customers and cultivate repeat buyers, the 3P model offers significant advantages.

Advertising and Marketing Opportunities

Both 1P and 3P sellers can access Amazon’s robust advertising platform, but the way each model interacts with these tools is different.

1P vendors are often lumped into Amazon’s broader marketing efforts, with less autonomy over ad strategy.

Amazon Retail typically drives the decisions behind promotions, often bundling your products into deals or advertising pushes that may not align with your brand goals.

3P sellers, on the other hand, have full control over their ad spend and strategy. You decide which products to promote, how much to invest, and which keywords to target.

This level of control allows you to create tailored campaigns that align with your broader business objectives.

Additionally, 3P sellers have more freedom to experiment with external traffic, driving customers from outside Amazon through their own channels.

The recent updates in Amazon Attribution also give 3P sellers better tools for tracking these campaigns, which can be a game-changer for businesses with an off-Amazon marketing strategy.

Hybrid Approach: Could Both Models Work?

For some brands, the answer isn’t a strict 1P or 3P decision—it’s both. By adopting a hybrid model, you can leverage the best of both worlds.

Many brands use 1P to sell high-volume SKUs for steady cash flow and Amazon’s distribution reach, while reserving niche or premium products for 3P to retain pricing control and brand presence.

However, managing a hybrid model is not for the faint of heart.

It requires a deep understanding of both Vendor Central and Seller Central, as well as the operational bandwidth to handle the logistical complexities of running two separate channels.

But for brands with the resources, it’s a strategy worth considering, offering both the scale of 1P and the agility of 3P.

Final Thoughts

There’s no clear-cut answer to the 1P vs. 3P question—it depends on your business goals, operational capacity, and appetite for control.

If maintaining pricing control, direct customer relationships, and access to detailed performance data are top priorities, the 3P model is likely the best fit.

On the other hand, if you value Amazon’s logistical expertise and are willing to cede control over pricing and marketing in exchange for faster scaling, the 1P model could be your path forward.

Whichever model you choose, remember that your decision isn’t set in stone.

Did you know that TikTok could be overtaking Amazon as the leading online store? Read more here.